On 5/9/07, ravindra_ks via erp-select wrote: > Indeed weel said Mr paul, generalization of B1/A1(R/3) is not a correct > way > of doing the things. So i understand company needs proper it setup to go for R/3,but whether all the business process can be covered by B1. Thanks for the explanation on the difference between B1 & R/3. Probably you need to look at your objective of erp adoption and then align your choice /option accordingly. So there are numerous such difference but it will needless to list them as selection should be based on your business objective and prerogative. It is platform independent while b1 is limited to work on MS platform only. So it is need/budget based kind fitment to the organization to fulfill there automation requirements.ī1 work on 2 tier client architecture with fat client and SQL server as back end while R/3 works on 3 tier architecture with lots of inherent capability to harness s/w, h/w and manpower resources optimally.
![sap business one module sap business one module](https://www.businessoneexperts.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Core-Modules.png)
Even a small company with few IT users can adopt B1 to leverage upon Business automation benefits unlike to r/3 which require a fair amount of IT maturity and specialized skills. B1 altogether is aimed at different niche contrary to R/3 system. Undoubtedly SDK is great making end-user customization a simple task. Infact its a simple and quick way of automatizing the business functions without getting into the depth of each operations. However there are n differences if we compare these 2 probably B1 lays the cornerstone for enterprise wide solution adoption through heavy weights solution like R/3. Geoff Crawford weel said Mr paul, generalization of B1/A1(R/3) is not a correct way of doing the things. (and I didn’t even begin to discuss retreads – if you deal with those that’s another complication generic systems won’t know what to do with, and further if you actually do the retreads themselves then you’ve got light manufacturing needs) Unless you’re looking at a tire specific package (and there are quite a few) will it handle cure dates? Will it know the difference between H’s, V’s, and M’s? Will it be able to recognize, sort, and properly substitute manufacturers of the same tires but still keep them separate for ordering and reporting purposes? (kludges with part numbering systems are going to cause you issues with one or the other, so beware) If you’re not looking at a tire specific solution you’re in for a lot more customization that you expected – the characteristics of tires mean searching and reporting is not the same as standard parts. If you don’t have that list of requirements, you aren’t ready to select a system. Those are the key factors in selecting a system. What if it’s missing military part numbering schemes? Is that something you care about? So instead of asking what it’s missing, tell us what you need – and in what priority. It’s not a matter of what a package is “missing”. You’re looking at this from the wrong direction. Any functionalities >missing in B1 for these modules? >Thanks. >Dear Shankar, > We’re planning to use only FICO,MM and SD only.
#SAP BUSINESS ONE MODULE DOWNLOAD#
Office firewalls, cyber cafes, college labs, don’t allow you to download CHAT? Here’s a solution!Īt 05:44 AM, Shiral.Soysa via erp-select wrote:
![sap business one module sap business one module](https://www.megathermerp.co.in/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/sap-business-one-modules.jpg)
We’re planning an implementation for a mid size tyre trading company and would like to know the differences of the product SAP Business 1 when compared to R/3. Hope the Above answers Your Query Thanks and Regards S.BharathiVinayagam H/P 09940083745
#SAP BUSINESS ONE MODULE SOFTWARE#
With the advent of distributed client-server computing SAP AG brought out a client-server version of the software called SAP R/3 that was manageable on multiple platforms and operating systems, such as Microsoft Windows or UNIX since 1999, which opened up SAP to a whole new customer base It was particularly popular with large multinational European companies who required soft-real-time business applications, with multi-currency and multi-language capabilities built in. SAP R/2 was a mainframe based business application software suite that was very successful in the 1980s and early 1990s. This was replaced by R/2 at the end of the 1970s. (The “R” was for “real-time processing”). The first version of SAP’s flagship enterprise software was a financial Accounting system named R/1. Pls Refer the Below Details of B! and 3 Business